Agree the boundaries
Document supplier terms, regions, retention behavior, model capabilities, and commercial permissions. Separate inference supply from any optional data license.
For inference suppliers
Good infrastructure.
A clearer route
to demand.
Help build a gateway where compatibility, policy, health, and cost determine the route—and suppliers can understand how they are evaluated.
SUPPLIER CONTROL PLANEDESIGN
One transparent
routing framework.
CapabilityProtocol & models
EligibilityTerms & policies
PerformanceHealth & cost
Published inputs. Conformance before rollout. Planned supplier-specific reporting.
The onboarding path
A deliberate start. A measured ramp.
The proposed supplier workflow combines commercial permissions with technical validation. Each stage has a clear purpose before production traffic is enabled.
Test the protocol
Validate streaming, tool calls, caching, error mapping, and usage reporting with a conformance suite. Share the report and resolve gaps before a ramp.
Ramp with evidence
Start with synthetic validation, then a controlled canary where authorized. Observe health, latency, throughput, and request accounting against release criteria.
Operate with visibility
Maintain effective-dated prices, capacity limits, and incident controls. Reconcile statements to usage and propagate model lifecycle changes.
Fair routing, explained
Terms are constraints.
Performance is evidence.
The routing design first decides whether an endpoint is eligible. Only then does it compare eligible routes using published scoring inputs.
Read the routing designHARD REQUIREMENTSMust be satisfied
Customer and organization policy
Supplier permissions and region
Required protocol and capability
Budget and maximum price
COMPARISON INPUTSFor eligible routes
Health, latency, cost, and cache affinity
Disclosed commercial inputs in the cost model
Two distinct relationships
Supplying inference.
Licensing data.
A provider may be interested in both. The consent, access, and commercial boundaries still need to remain separate.
Your operational view
The proposed supplier workspace exposes your own usage, health, endpoints, and statements. It does not expose competitors’ traffic or pricing.
Optional, licensed data access
Any data-back arrangement requires its own permission chain and license. Serving a request does not automatically authorize buying or reusing its session record.
One controlled lifecycle
Price changes, model additions, deprecations, and route eligibility are designed to be versioned and reviewed, with clear notice to affected users.
Are any supplier partnerships announced?
This preview makes no claim of an existing vendor partnership, production supplier agreement, or available model inventory. We welcome conversations with model providers and inference platforms.
What does the conformance process cover?
The planned process covers streaming, tool use, usage accuracy, caching, error semantics, and operational behavior. Requirements depend on the protocol and advertised capabilities. Production support will follow a documented test report.
Can a supplier pay for preferred placement?
The design calls for published routing inputs and no undisclosed pay-for-placement. Any commercial adjustment that affects cost ranking must be represented in the disclosed cost model, while customer policy and eligibility remain hard constraints.
Build with us
Bring your endpoint. Let’s map the fit.
Share your protocol, models, regions, and operating requirements. We’ll start with the details that matter.