Consent & permitted use
An explicit consent receipt, a defined recipient class, and a machine-readable license. Repository rights and organization permission are eligibility requirements.
Explore a planned source of coding trajectories with explicit consent, traceable model calls, and evidence of what the work achieved.
Example structure. No real session or dataset is represented.
A useful coding trajectory connects a request to the work around it and to a measurable result. Each layer carries its own evidence and its own limitations.
An explicit consent receipt, a defined recipient class, and a machine-readable license. Repository rights and organization permission are eligibility requirements.
Router evidence and device-signed context are designed to connect the submitted record with the model calls that actually passed through the gateway.
Changes, tool events, and task structure help explain how a result was reached. Sensitive or unauthorized content must pass separate exclusion checks.
Tests, CI, or other independently sourced checks provide a stronger signal than an agent saying it is done. Evidence levels are labeled instead of flattened into one score.
The planned buyer experience puts manifests, schema contracts, license restrictions, and acceptance criteria alongside the data itself.
Canonical trajectories and manifests, with proposed JSONL and Parquet exports. Schema changes should be explicit, documented, and testable.
Published sampling methods, defect categories, and confidence intervals. No quality percentages are presented here as measured results.
Permitted uses, recipient classes, retention, and takedown obligations attached to each delivery. Evaluation-only access and clean rooms remain later-stage options.
The marketplace is not open. Dataset availability depends on developer consent, supplier terms, verified rights, and release readiness. We’re speaking with prospective buyers to shape useful, responsible data products.
No live catalog or available inventory is claimed in this preview. Early conversations focus on task categories, outcome evidence, format requirements, permitted uses, and acceptance criteria.
Yes, the design supports that possibility, with separate permissions and data boundaries. Being a supplier would not grant access to competitors’ traffic or broader contribution data. Every delivery still requires an eligible license.
Provenance establishes evidence about origin and integrity. It does not establish correctness by itself. Test results, CI, and other outcome evidence are separate layers and must be assessed on their own terms.
Versioned datasets and filtered lots are the starting point. Streams, funded campaigns, evaluation-only holdouts, and clean-room access are roadmap concepts with separate technical and contractual requirements.
Tell us about your training or evaluation problem, the task categories you need, and how you would measure quality.